A clinical laboratory now processes thousands of pages of calibration reports quarterly—with automated failure detection and remediation recommendations.
The Challenge
Clinical laboratories must validate their analytical instruments before use. This involves running hundreds of test specimens and documenting results in calibration reports for CLIA, CAP, and state health department compliance.
Our client faces an ongoing validation workload: 16–20 PDFs every quarter, each approximately 300 pages. Mixed content—cover pages, data tables, scatter plots, summary statistics. Manual review consumed days of a lab director's time each cycle.
The Outcome
Every calibration report is now processed automatically. Pass/fail results are extracted into structured spreadsheets. Failures generate detailed reports with specific remediation steps. Lab directors focus on exceptions, not page-by-page review.
Deliverables
Every calibration record extracted into spreadsheets. Assay names, pass/fail status, error indices, specimen counts—all in a consistent format.
When issues are detected, detailed reports explain what failed and why. Specific remediation steps based on failure type. Ready for quality review.
Output formatted for regulatory requirements. CLIA, CAP, state health department audits supported with consistent, traceable records.
This approach works for any high-volume document workflow—legal contracts, medical records, financial reports, regulatory filings. Let's discuss your use case.
Schedule a Conversation